On February 14, Kevin O’Leary won a default judgment in a defamation case against Ben “BitBoy” Armstrong in the Southern District of Florida Federal Court, receiving a total award of $2.8 million. The court found that the defendant’s posting of “malicious” false accusations and private information on social media constituted serious defamation and punitive damages.
The ruling awarded O’Leary $750,000 in emotional distress damages, $78,000 in reputation damages, and an additional $2 million in punitive damages. The judge noted that as a public figure engaged in media and business collaborations, damage to O’Leary’s reputation would directly impact his performance invitations and business relationships. Expert testimony, based on the viewership of the relevant posts, the size of the affected audience, and repair costs, estimated the reputation loss at $78,000.
The dispute originated from multiple posts made by Armstrong in March 2025, accusing O’Leary of involvement in a fatal boat accident in 2019, and publicly sharing his private phone number in one post, urging fans to “call the murderer in real life.” The court found that O’Leary was only a passenger at the time and was not prosecuted; his wife was also declared innocent after the trial. The accident investigation indicated that another boat had no lights at the time. After the phone number was leaked, O’Leary received hundreds of calls, leading to an annual security expense of approximately $200,000 and changes to his travel and work routines for safety reasons.
Procedurally, O’Leary filed suit on March 26, 2025; service was completed by March 28. Armstrong repeatedly failed to respond within the deadline, despite court extensions and clear warnings, and did not submit a response. The clerk entered a default on May 6. A damages hearing was held on October 30, with Armstrong still absent. He later sought to dismiss the case citing detention and bipolar disorder, but the court found he had been properly notified, delayed nearly a year, and was harming the plaintiff’s interests, and thus dismissed the motion.
This case serves as a warning: spreading false accusations and “doxxing” others on social media can lead to high damages and long-term legal consequences. The parties involved include Kevin O’Leary, Ben “BitBoy” Armstrong, and O’Leary’s public role as an investor on “Shark Tank.”
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Sports-betting event contracts are derivatives! The U.S. CFTC blocks local law enforcement and seeks regulatory authority over prediction markets
The U.S. federal government is working with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to transfer regulatory authority over Kalshi prediction markets from local governments to the federal level, arguing that sports event contracts are financial derivatives. If the court supports this position, it will change the legal status of prediction markets and standardize regulation nationwide, reducing the impact of state-level gaming laws.
CryptoCity2h ago
Senators Probe Trump Token Activity as Political and Financial Risks Emerge
Lawmakers are intensifying scrutiny of a Trump-linked memecoin event as concerns grow over potential financial conflicts, market volatility, and the influence of token-based access models tied to political activities.
Key Takeaways:
Senators Warren, Schiff, and Blumenthal probe TRUMP token event
Coinpedia3h ago
A court rules that sports betting contract agreements are derivatives! The US CFTC blocks local law enforcement and fights for regulatory control of prediction markets.
The U.S. federal government is working jointly with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority over Kalshi prediction markets from local governments to the federal government, arguing that sports betting contracts are financial derivatives. If the court supports this position, it will change the legal status of prediction markets and unify regulation nationwide, reducing the impact of local gambling laws.
CryptoCity5h ago
Holding sports betting contracts as derivatives! The U.S. CFTC blocks local enforcement and seeks regulatory control over prediction markets
The U.S. federal government is working with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority over Kalshi prediction markets from state and local governments to the federal government, arguing that sports betting contracts are financial derivatives. If the court supports this position, it would change the legal status of prediction markets and standardize regulation nationwide, reducing the impact of state and local gambling laws.
CryptoCity8h ago
Polymarket Investigation Demanded by Congress After 50 New Accounts Bet on Iran Ceasefire Before Trump Announced It
Congressional scrutiny arises over Polymarket after over 50 new accounts placed bets on a US-Iran ceasefire just before Trump's announcement. Lawmakers are demanding a CFTC investigation, highlighting concerns about insider trading and the platform's regulatory status.
Cryptonews8h ago
A judge blocks Arizona from regulating prediction markets, halts the lawsuit against Kalshi
A U.S. federal court ruled to pause Arizona’s regulatory actions against the prediction market platform Kalshi, finding that the federal government has priority in regulating financial derivatives. The platform argues that its event contracts are not traditional gambling, but financial instruments. This ruling may affect a nationwide, unified regulatory framework for financial markets.
ChainNewsAbmedia10h ago
