Pantera Capital CEO Dan Morehead stated at the Ondo Summit that Bitcoin’s performance over the next decade could significantly outperform gold, primarily because large institutions have almost zero allocation to Bitcoin. Data shows that the median institutional Bitcoin holding is “close to 0.0%,” while gold has long held a stable position in most traditional asset portfolios. He views this structural gap as a potential long-term driving force.
Currently, many pension funds, endowments, and sovereign wealth funds remain cautious about Bitcoin. On one hand, this is due to risk assessment pressures from price volatility; on the other hand, it relates to regulatory pathways and a lack of sufficient historical data samples. However, Dan Morehead believes that this “gap between perception and allocation” actually presents an asymmetric opportunity. Once institutions allocate just 1% to 2% of their assets to Bitcoin, demand shifts could have a noticeable impact on prices.
Historically, Bitcoin has outperformed gold by over 5100% in the past decade. Gold still possesses safe-haven attributes, but as an emerging digital store of value, Bitcoin offers advantages such as a fixed supply cap of 21 million coins, rapid cross-border transferability, and transparency and verifiability. These features are attracting more investors concerned about inflation and currency devaluation risks.
Founded in 2013, Pantera Capital is one of the earliest hedge funds focused on crypto assets. The firm’s early investments in Bitcoin yielded substantial returns, reinforcing its long-term trend outlook. Dan Morehead also pointed out that countries continue to expand their money supply to cope with economic pressures, risking dilution of fiat currency purchasing power, while Bitcoin’s scarcity provides a hedge potential.
He predicts that the institutionalization of Bitcoin will not happen overnight but will advance through “gradual infiltration.” As the holding ratio moves from near zero to a significant scale, the price discovery mechanism will accelerate, and Bitcoin’s role in asset allocation may also change. For long-term investors, this comparison with gold may just be beginning.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
BTC 15-minute drop of 0.58%: Large on-chain withdrawals and bearish derivatives sentiment coincide to weigh on the price
From 2026-04-12 22:00 to 22:15 (UTC), the BTC price fluctuated between 70693.8 and 71371.8 USDT. During this period, the candlestick return rate recorded -0.58%, and the amplitude reached 0.95%. The short-term downside caused market attention to rise rapidly, and some investors accelerated adjustments to their hedging positions.
The main drivers behind this change were concentrated on-chain large-fund outflows and a short-term defensive shift in the derivatives market. On-chain data shows that net outflow transactions of large funds $100k and above totaled more than 800 BTC in aggregate from exchanges; meanwhile, the exchanges’ overall BTC holdings
GateNews33m ago
The New York Times reignites the “Satoshi identity mystery”; after Adam Back was targeted, he quickly clarified
Author: Nancy, PANews
Satoshi Nakamoto’s real identity remains the mystery that has continued for 17 years in the crypto world. Guesses surrounding this pseudonym have never stopped—candidates ranging from cryptographers to company founders have come and gone, yet there has always been a lack of decisive evidence.
Recently, The New York Times published a 10,000-plus-word investigation. Based on multiple comparisons drawn from language style, technical paths, and historical context, it ranked Blockstream CEO Adam Back as the strongest candidate for Satoshi Nakamoto. However, this claim was quickly and explicitly denied by Back himself, and the relevant arguments were widely questioned by the industry as difficult to substantiate.
Satoshi Nakamoto identity controversy flares up again; the 10,000-plus-word investigation targets Adam Back
In this investigation, New York Times reporter John Carreyrou spent more than a year deeply sorting through decades of archives and the cypherpunk email mailing lists to
区块客3h ago
