January 21 News, against the backdrop of intense volatility in global risk assets in 2026, a highly noteworthy signal is emerging in the Bitcoin market: large capital continues to accumulate, while retail investors are panic-selling. On-chain data from Santiment shows that in the past nine days, wallets holding between 10 and 10,000 BTC have collectively accumulated an additional 36,322 BTC, worth approximately $3.2 billion at current prices, representing a 0.27% increase in holdings. This “whale and shark” level of capital flow is regarded by the market as a potential prerequisite for a price breakout.
In stark contrast, retail behavior shows a different trend. During the same period, small coin-holding addresses sold about 132 BTC in total, with overall holdings decreasing by 0.28%. This divergence typically indicates that emotional capital is exiting during the decline, while more experienced investors are quietly building positions. Such structural divergence in on-chain investment strategies often appears near phase-bottom regions.
From a price perspective, Bitcoin initially surged over 7% at the start of 2026, but later retreated due to Trump’s announcement of tariffs on multiple European countries, which reignited pressure on global risk assets. BTC subsequently fell below the $88,000 level, then rebounded to hover around $89,000, with short-term volatility significantly amplified.
For investors paying attention to Bitcoin trends and Gate trading activity, this shift in capital structure has high reference value. Historically, when savvy funds continue to buy while retail investors sell off, it often signals room for subsequent price recovery. Despite ongoing macro uncertainties, on-chain capital behavior indicates that the medium- to long-term bullish logic for Bitcoin remains intact.
Currently, Bitcoin price forecasts, whale movements, and on-chain capital flows have become some of the most critical indicators to watch in the 2026 crypto market. As long as this capital divergence persists, the market could trigger a new directional rally at any time.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
BTC 15-minute drop of 0.58%: Large on-chain withdrawals and bearish derivatives sentiment coincide to weigh on the price
From 2026-04-12 22:00 to 22:15 (UTC), the BTC price fluctuated between 70693.8 and 71371.8 USDT. During this period, the candlestick return rate recorded -0.58%, and the amplitude reached 0.95%. The short-term downside caused market attention to rise rapidly, and some investors accelerated adjustments to their hedging positions.
The main drivers behind this change were concentrated on-chain large-fund outflows and a short-term defensive shift in the derivatives market. On-chain data shows that net outflow transactions of large funds $100k and above totaled more than 800 BTC in aggregate from exchanges; meanwhile, the exchanges’ overall BTC holdings
GateNews58m ago
The New York Times reignites the “Satoshi identity mystery”; after Adam Back was targeted, he quickly clarified
Author: Nancy, PANews
Satoshi Nakamoto’s real identity remains the mystery that has continued for 17 years in the crypto world. Guesses surrounding this pseudonym have never stopped—candidates ranging from cryptographers to company founders have come and gone, yet there has always been a lack of decisive evidence.
Recently, The New York Times published a 10,000-plus-word investigation. Based on multiple comparisons drawn from language style, technical paths, and historical context, it ranked Blockstream CEO Adam Back as the strongest candidate for Satoshi Nakamoto. However, this claim was quickly and explicitly denied by Back himself, and the relevant arguments were widely questioned by the industry as difficult to substantiate.
Satoshi Nakamoto identity controversy flares up again; the 10,000-plus-word investigation targets Adam Back
In this investigation, New York Times reporter John Carreyrou spent more than a year deeply sorting through decades of archives and the cypherpunk email mailing lists to
区块客3h ago
