Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Just caught up on what went down at the White House crypto meeting yesterday, and honestly, this stablecoin yield debate is taking a pretty significant turn. Looks like regulators are finally stepping in to actually move the needle on the CLARITY Act instead of letting both sides keep circling each other.
So here's what I'm seeing: the White House brought Patrick Witt to the table with a draft text that basically signals one major thing - earning yield on idle stablecoin balances is effectively off the table now. That's huge for where this negotiation is heading. The meeting was tighter than before, just key players from Coinbase, Ripple, a16z, and the Blockchain Association on the crypto side, while banks showed up through their trade associations rather than individual reps.
The whole thing started because banks got nervous about the GENIUS Act, worried that if platforms could offer interest on stablecoins, it could mess with their deposit flows and credit creation. They pushed hard to ban rewards across the board - not just from issuers but from exchanges and brokers too. Crypto industry obviously pushed back, which is why we've been stuck for the past month.
What's interesting is how the White House basically narrowed the battlefield. Instead of debating whether yields should exist at all, now it's just about whether crypto firms can offer rewards for specific actions - like account openings or cashback. The anti-evasion language is pretty tight too: SEC, CFTC, and Treasury get enforcement authority, with penalties up to $500,000 per violation per day. That's the kind of effective regulatory framework that actually closes loopholes.
One crypto attendee made a solid point - banks' concerns might be more about competitive pressure than actual deposit risk. Meanwhile, the banking side is still pushing for a study on how payment stablecoins affect deposits. Both sides seem willing to keep talking, and word is an end-of-month deadline might actually be realistic now. If this breaks the log jam on the CLARITY Act, we could finally see some real market structure legislation move forward.