Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Shark Tank’s Kevin O’Leary wins $2.8M defamation suit against Ben ‘BitBoy’ Armstrong
Kevin O’Leary, an entrepreneur and television investor best known for Shark Tank, secured a $2.8 million judgment against Ben Armstrong, a crypto content creator who operated under the name BitBoy, in a defamation case decided this week by a federal court in Miami.
According to a recent order, the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida awarded O’Leary $750,000 for emotional distress, $78,000 for harm to his reputation, and $2 million in punitive damages after Armstrong failed to appear or respond throughout the proceeding.
The dispute arose from posts Armstrong made in March 2025, accusing O’Leary of involvement in a fatal boating accident that occurred in 2019. O’Leary was a passenger in the incident, and his wife was later cleared of wrongdoing following a trial.
Armstrong’s posts, which drew roughly 156,000 views, also included O’Leary’s personal phone number and encouraged followers to contact him. The disclosure triggered a suspension on the social platform and prompted O’Leary to increase his annual security spending by an estimated $200,000.
The court found that Armstrong acted with actual malice and noted his pattern of hostile communications, including messages sent to judges in separate proceedings.
Armstrong sought to have the default judgment overturned, citing incarceration and mental health conditions, including bipolar disorder.
However, the court rejected Armstrong’s request, noting that he had actual notice of the lawsuit and had already been properly served, yet he waited nearly a year to act.
The court also found that setting aside the default judgment would unfairly prejudice O’Leary, who had already prepared the motions and expert reports and had attended a full evidentiary hearing.